Shor Consulting, Inc.

Services

Tech Product Engineering & Development

We provide senior technical leadership and hands-on architecture for companies whose product has to carry real workloads and real compliance. That means technical due diligence, architecture and build-versus-buy decisions, modernisation of systems that have stopped being safe to change, and standing up or repairing the engineering organisation itself — typically as a fractional CTO over three to twelve months, or as a fixed-fee assessment in four to six weeks.

When companies call us

Four situations account for almost all of it.

The roadmap has stalled and nobody can explain why. Velocity dropped, estimates stopped meaning anything, and the explanations from inside the team have become mutually contradictory. This is usually architectural debt presenting as a people problem, or a people problem presenting as architectural debt, and telling which is which from the inside is nearly impossible.

An investor or an acquirer is about to look under the hood. Technical due diligence is coming and the company would like to know what will be found before someone else finds it.

A decision is about to be made that cannot be unmade. Build or buy. Rewrite or refactor. Which cloud, which database, which vendor, whether to take on the compliance regime that opens the enterprise market. These decisions have a long half-life and are usually made by whoever is most confident in the room.

The product has to become compliant. HIPAA, SOC 2, HITRUST, PCI. A team that has never shipped under a regulatory regime does not know what it doesn’t know, and the gap is rarely where they expect.

How we work

We start with the code and the calendar, not the org chart. Reading a repository and six months of tickets tells you more in two days than a week of interviews. Interviews come second, to explain what the artefacts already showed.

Something real ships early. Not a deck, not a diagram — a working thing in a staging environment that the client can open. On platform engagements we target week two. A recommendation nobody can touch is a recommendation nobody will act on.

Decisions are written down with their reasoning. Every significant architectural call gets a short record: what we chose, what we rejected, what would have to change for us to revisit it. This is the artefact that outlives the engagement and it is often the most valuable thing we leave.

We hire our own replacement. On fractional CTO engagements, recruiting and onboarding the permanent technical leader is part of the scope, not an afterthought. The engagement is successful when it ends.

What we actually bring

Thirty years of shipping, and a current operating seat. Right now that means a multi-tenant diagnostics platform under HIPAA, with HL7 v2 and FHIR R4 interoperability, six role-scoped portals, a visual workflow engine of more than 170 modules, and an AI-first engineering pipeline running in production. Before that, a decade of enterprise marketing technology under SOC 2, and a short-term rental underwriting model over a national dataset.

We are not a staffing firm and we do not sell a bench. Teams are assembled per engagement from people we have shipped with before.

Where we are strongest

Healthcare and regulated industries, where the compliance surface is the hard part. Marketing and commerce technology, where measurement is the hard part. And any situation where a data model has to make a decision someone will spend money on.

Start here

Tell me what you're working on.

The useful first conversation is usually thirty minutes and specific: what you're trying to move, what you've already tried, and what's in the way. If it isn't something we should do, I'll say so and point you at who should.